Excellence – Now!

August 12th, 2010

by Bob Gibson

The Little Big Things by Tom PetersThis year while on vacation I spent time with “The little BIG things—163 ways to pursue Excellence,” by Tom Peters. It’s a business “idea” book, with topics that are indexed for easy reference (NOTE: the one on customers should be read frequently by anyone trying to build a business).

I have to admit, I’ve been a long time fan, and 20+ years ago, somewhere between “In Search of Excellence” and “Thriving On Chaos” I had the chance to meet him in person.

This book reminded me why I love Tom Peters. He is wildly passionate about companies and individuals striving for excellence, and his style is overwhelming. You can hear his rants and his passion as you read. Trying to take everything in is like trying to drink from a fire hydrant—the ideas gush out fast and furious. It’s the same when you hear him speak.

So, in this book, his proposition in a nutshell, is…to pursue excellence, first go back to the basics to remember why you are doing what you are doing. Then, re-examine what it is about your work that is most important. Then, seek out the little BIG things that matter most and give those things your full and undivided attention.

For example, in an average day, there are things we do where “excellent” is not required. When I mow the grass, it isn’t important how I do it…just that I do it. But there are other things that demand a higher degree of care, attention, thought, and concern—excellence. How we treat the people we love. How we perform our jobs. How we serve our customers.

So anyway, here I am on vacation…and Tom (with all his fired up zeal) has got me thinking about business again—our business—the business of Innovation Realized.

Why are we doing what we do? As designers and communicators, we are committed to creating innovative solutions for our customers and end users, which will enhance their lives in meaningful ways and bring added value and enjoyment, above and beyond what is available to them today.

What is most important? That we create and deliver innovation that works—that meets or exceeds the goals set up by our clients—that creates value for the end user—that builds preference for our clients products and brands.

And what are the little BIG things that matter most?

I’m going to be looking at that very closely over the next few weeks. I will be seeking the counsel of my partners and our staff. But one thing I can tell you is that we have always considered Design Excellence and Extraordinary Customer Service as non-negotiable responsibilities of anyone in our firm. I think we’ve been doing a pretty good job, but have we Pursued Excellence?

To quote Tom: “If not EXCELLENCE, what? If not EXCELLENCE now, when?”

When it Comes to Logos—Bigger Isn’t Always Better

August 9th, 2010

by Bree Basham, AIGA

Trends for fall 2010 show “it” bags to be less conspicuous. Think less logos and more color, structure, pattern, and hardware trends like zippers, studs, and fringe. As well, we’re seeing a revamp in ladylike classics first introduced years ago—before the logo trend hit—from fashion houses like Dior, Hermés, and Fendi.

As well, a new study to be published in the “Journal of Consumer Research” indicates that while mid-range shoppers still are drawn to logos, the very high-end consumer looks for subtler cues when it comes to designer products. For high-end consumers, it’s more about detail, pattern, and more discreet markers of heritage, decipherable to only those that know what they are looking for.

The segment of the high-end population who can afford to buy designer items like most of us buy pieces from The Gap is small—they likely have the logos they want already and are moving on. However, for mid-range consumers who look at a Gucci or Vuitton bag as a special treat or an occasional splurge are somewhat allured by the idea of the markings on the bag to qualify their purchase.

Regardless of your expendable income, certainly over-saturation (think Paris Hilton, Juicy Suits, and Jersey Shore), as well as an overall sensitivity to the down economy, has contributed to many consumers wanting to elevate (i.e., distance) themselves from those who “flaunt what they’ve got.”

Louis Vuitton Monogram Tote

Louis Vuitton Damier Tote

There are classics that will always be classics—for example, Louis Vuitton’s monogrammed bags are still their bestsellers. But a close new competitor is their Damier line of checkerboard print bags, which were initially planned as a seasonal selection and have stayed on.

Signing off from one girl who’s signed up for the trend—we’ve picked out the checkerboard tote for a 60th birthday gift for my Mom this week. It will be all I can do to hand the box over to her.

DIY Design at IDSA Conference

August 4th, 2010

by Mike Garten, IDSA

There’s an interesting theme at this year’s IDSA International Conference being held in Portland, OR. It’s DIY Design: Threat or Opportunity?

The conference is exploring a number of topics around this theme, but one that is particularly interesting to the field of design and innovation is the topic of Enabling Technologies. With sophisticated software and prototyping capabilities now readily available, do we still need professional designers? Or, can anyone with the technology create market winning innovation?

Short answer? Yes, and…No.Two young men sitting on a couch and playing a video game

Professional designers are still needed because they’re trained in a variety of skills beyond the use of just 3D modeling and prototyping technologies. These skills  include critical thinking, problem solving, and process skills around design innovation, that simply can’t be captured in a software program, regardless of its sophistication. To say anyone can design a complex product solution that meets all usability, market, and production requirements without the appropriate training and experience, is similar to saying I can fly a jetliner by only buying a flight simulator program.

So, just as you wouldn’t want me as your pilot during your next flight at 37,000 feet, you shouldn’t risk the success of your next product (and your business) to less than a trained professional.

What do you think?

Some at BP are Listening

August 3rd, 2010

by Jamey Boiter

A month or so ago, I suggested in a Fast Company blog that maybe what BP needed to do, as part of a total rethink, to recover and find themselves as a brand again was to lose the BP badge. The BP logo is now tainted forever with several years of oil disasters, mismanagement of the brand, and the tragic loss of life and environment. My suggestion was to consider bringing back the Amoco brand, now shelved for for years, and rebirth a real global energy company. Well, apparently, some at BP think that might be a good start. Ariel Schwartz at Fast Company reports on a growing group of independent owners that think it should at least be considered.

Why, Yes, It’s the “Y”

July 28th, 2010

by Jamey Boiter, AIGA

Blogs and web sites have been all a flutter over the past few weeks with the announcement of the rebranding effort by Siegel+Gale for the YMCA. It’s the first brand update in over 40 years for the organization, which was founded in 1844. Opinions, both positive and negative, are coming from citizens and communities to designers and strategists.

The YMCA Before and The Y New LogoSo, why do this now? Howard Belk, Co-President, CEO, and Chief Creative Officer explains it this way, “The underlying reason for change was simple. The mission of the Y has broadened dramatically over the past 20 years and the organization’s brand—its story—needs to better express its highest order impact on our world. The new identity is that of an organization that strengthens the essential foundations of community.”

Based on the strategic work performed, and how the organization has migrated to add to its social agenda and overall outreach, I think it was good timing, and a good move. If anything, they should have done it sooner. The friendly logo-mark, and the youthful colors all work for me. And as far as officially calling it “the Y,” it’s always been “the Y” for me. My first away-from-home camp experience was Y camp, many years ago.

However, among the concerns being expressed is whether the organization is moving away from its Christian value roots, even though it still remains as part of the mission statement, and everything it does seems to center around building “a healthy mind, spirit, and body for all…”

Time will tell on this point, as the new brand engages with the market through communications and experiences. But this “voiced” concern does give me the opportunity to highlight a vital issue that should always be examined before embarking on any rebranding effort. And that is:

What is your brand’s existing equity in the hearts and minds of your customer, and where in particular does that equity create the most meaning, importance and value?

In this case, how much of the brand’s positive equity that creates preference with its customers, is based on it being a Christian-based organization? If the meaning and value of this foundational brand pillar is no longer as relevant, then it is the task of the leadership team to weigh the level of its outward portrayal against the importance of the organization’s original vision. But, if it is still just as important, then the decision to minimize its presence should be weighed very carefully.

A well-conceived and implemented brand identity is based on foundational elements—the pillars of the brand—that are created from the truth inherent in the brand. They are the few key attributes that make the brand distinctive and meaningful. And this is the platform from which a strong strategy can be built and a market proposition of high value delivered.

So, when considering a rebrand, check the foundation first. Is it still solid with only a facelift needed, or has there been a fundamental and significant change in the truth of the brand that warrants a transformational change?

Which leads me back to “the Y.” I’m sure they did their homework. But what do you think?

Oh, and whatever happened to the YWCA?

Renaming Brainstorming

July 22nd, 2010

by Monty Montague, IDSA

Newsweek is the latest publication to question the creative virtues of  “brainstorming.”  I’ve seen brainstorming work incredibly well, and I’ve also seen it misused. To use it effectively, I think we need to rename it—a little creative naming might shift our understanding of what we now call brainstorming, and reposition it as a tool that really works.
BrainstormingFirst let’s look at what makes brainstorming effective—“piggy backing” on someone else’s idea. Time and time again I have seen a participant propose a hopelessly uninspired idea (I’ll break with brainstorming etiquette and call that a “bad idea”); then a second participant sees something in the bad idea, proposes a brilliant follow up idea, and boom!, a “good idea” is born. Often the good idea has none of the family characteristics of the bad one, it’s just a distant cousin. But without the bad idea, the good one would not have emerged.

So let’s rename these creative gatherings with a name that speaks to the notion of seeing something in someone else’s idea.

How about…Evokation?  Snowballing?  Piggybacking?  Group Grope? Germination Sessions?

What’s your idea for the new brainstorming name?

Innovation Challenged! What’s your answer?

July 14th, 2010

by Ed Holme

In an article yesterday in the Wall Street Journal, consumers are seen challenging the value of innovative new products, but from a viewpoint that the innovation is making their existing products obsolete. The essence of their argument is…If I can buy the blades, then why do I need a new razor—the old one works just fine—actually, very well. Why do they keep making new razors? I am starting to get suspicious of their motives.

Man ShavingSo, is this “innovation run amuck?” Has competitive one-upmanship got in the way of truly serving the consumer? Or more sinisterly…are these companies actually playing the game the consumers are starting to accuse them of?

There will be a continued battle in the world of consumer product innovation between the goals of “design” (to create better products that provide value/benefit and enhanced performance and function to the user), and the goals of “business” (to create new products that drive sales and meaningful differentiation for our company’s competitive advantage—or something like that).

Innovation can become a fine line—or razor edge—between truth or gain. Ideally both are accomplished. But be aware of innovating purely for market gain. If consumers start to question your integrity, you may find it detrimental to your goals…Oh, and your brand!

Let us know how you stand on this issue, and how you balance these priorities.

Water Pitcher for Applica is a Consumer Reports “Best Buy”

May 28th, 2010

In the May 2010 issue of Consumer Reports, a BOLTgroup innovation is highlighted as a Consumer Reports Best Buy.

Applica Clear2OThe innovative Clear2O water pitcher gained a Consumer Reports Best Buy in the filtered water carafe category. According to the reviewers, the Clear2O is “excellent at removing lead and chloroform” and “its ‘quick-connect’ hose improves flow rate.”

BOLTgroup partnered with Applica to conceive and design the Clear2O. BOLTgroup handled consumer insights research, product ideation, industrial design, and mechanical engineering. Through BOLTgroup’s research, it became clear that users desired a pitcher that filled faster, held more, and filtered better. The Clear2O’s innovative design does all three…and Consumer Reports agrees by giving Clear2O its only “best buy” in the category.

Congratulations to Applica and to the BOLTgroup team!


BOLTgroup’s Jamey Boiter – Brand Innovatr in Fast Company

April 23rd, 2010

Jamey Boiter, one of BOLTgroup’s principals, has written 4 blogs over the last 3 months for Fast Company.  Here, Fast Company introduces Jamey as their new blogger “Brand Innovatr” and highlights some recent brand innovation projects he has directed at BOLTgroup.

If you missed any of Jamey’s blogs, choose one of the titles below to jump to the blog:
Can Brands Launch Sustainable Campaigns Without Being Accused of Greenwashing?
Logos Get Lost in the Supermarket, Here’s Why
Can Bank Brands Ever Earn Back Our Trust?
TOMS Shoes Teaches Consumer Empathy With a Day Spent Barefoot

—————–

Jamey is a nationally recognized brand strategist and practitioner. As BOLTgroup’s brand principal, he leads all brand strategy, development and graphic design teams. He has received numerous awards of excellence, ADDYs, and citations for his work in brand development, packaging and corporate identity, including award-winning projects for Lowe’s, IZOD, Nat Nast, G.H. Bass, Marc Ecko, McDavid Sports, and Forté Cashmere. Jamey has been involved in strategic brand development and design management programs with world-class brands such as Kobalt Tools, Ryobi, Coca-Cola, Kraft, IZOD, and Phillips-Van Heusen, and has been a featured speaker at national conferences and college campuses on the subject of brand strategy and development. Click here to email Jamey.

Flash! The Design Gravitas of the Apple Brand

April 15th, 2010

> FLASH! is ideas, views and opinions to inspire dialogue and fresh thinking.
We’d love to hear your comments.

by Monty Montague, IDSA

Jonathan Ive and Team Apple have had a remarkable influence on product design worldwide. Ive has single handedly put the kibosh on the “crown” – those long sweeping curves designers relied on for product style and grace – and replaced it with a strict regimen of flat rectangles and radiused corners. The Apple design language, characterized by geometric purity, design restraint, and perfection in fit and finish, is really pretty simple…and that’s the point. Ive and his team want their designs to “get out of the way” allowing the user to focus attention where it counts – on the interface. Designers in every industry have borrowed from Ive’s playbook. From consumer electronics (look at the newest Kindle Reader), to appliances (such as the Phillips Golite BLU), to cars (Ford Flex), product designers of all stripes have embraced the “less is more” mantra.

Read the rest of this entry »